Intelligence
Every thing is intelligence, nothing ever existed.
Scientific knowledge explains 2 things, the living and the non-living.
Living things have certain characters and are supposed to be different from the non-living.
Living things are characterized by their ability to recognize themselves. In perfect words they have the awareness of their own existence, where as the non-living (supposedly) don’t have this ability.
Now, try to understand this logic.
CASE 1:
Imagine yourself ship-wrecked and in a lonely island where there is nobody to recognize you. You are non-existent to the whole world (in fact the whole world is blissfully ignorant of your existence). But, you are aware of your existence. Here you have lost the character of existence in the view point of the world, however, your existence is there (thanks to your very own awareness). If you lose your awareness of your existence, you practically become non-existent.
CASE: 2
Imagine you are in a city and have lost your mind (some demylenating illness or in some kind of coma). In your very own opinion you don’t exist (in fact you don’t have an opinion). But, your existence will be there in the view-point of the world (because you are in a city and there are people who recognize your existence).
In the above mentioned cases there is one point in common that awareness is present in both and its existence is dependant on the ability to recognize (that awareness can be either your very own self’s or that of other intelligent beings’).
So, how can a non-living thing exist.(it is supposed to have no awareness of itself). The answer is quite evident. Their existence is dependent on the awareness or recognizing ability of intelligent beings.
How much is it dependent on intelligence?
Its dependence is complete (to the very fundamental and basic existence of intelligence). We shall see. Imagine if nobody sees a particular stone in a forest. Literally nobody sees it. Can we( or for that matter anyone) say the stone ever existed. We cant say because we did not perceive it (and the stone cant say that it exists because it lacks awareness) for all practical and theoretical purposes the stone does not exist.
This is a tricky situation, a doubt in your mind tells you “fine, why can’t the stone exist even if nobody observes it?” “do you mean to say that if I don’t observe the sun ( or for that matter if nobody observes the sun) will it cease to exist?”
The answer is very simple “yes”. If nobody ever witnessed the sun there will never be a question like the one you asked above. So, the question doesn’t properly satisfy the condition. If we are able to ask “whether this particular thing (here the stone in forest) existed or not.”, the very question ( because the question is nothing but intelligence/awareness) recognizes the existence of the stone (in question) thereby it does not satisfying the condition “if nobody ever observes………”. This means any doubts, questions, inquiries, analysis etc about the existence (of the stone) give the stone the status of existence.
Now we will try to understand it in a different example. Nobody ever witnessed a thing called “qowpgjffo”. (Before this second, I, myself don’t know anything about “qowpgjffo”). Since no one ever witnessed it or has at least a faint hint of its existence it does not exist.(but it comes in to existence the very second I gave this example “Nobody ever …….“qowpgjffo”, here my intelligence gives way to its existence).
So, non-living things exist nowhere but in the intelligence. Intelligence defines non-living things. In fact there is never any non-living thing , there is only intelligence in the form of living and non-living things. It is the intelligence that defines the living and non-living things as separate and distinct.
Scientifically speaking, imagine a glass of water in front of you. The water in the glass is not you, it is non-living “thing”. Now if you drink water, it becomes you ( a living thing). Water in a space enclosed by a tumbler is non living but when it is enclosed in a space surrounded by a living thing(here the stomach), it becomes living! Oh my gosh! Where is the separation between living and non living things.
Cell is 90% water and 9% salts, minerals, etc, rest contains proteins, fat globules, ions, energy, oxygen, CO2, etc. and we humans could not understand what is a living thing until now.
DNA contains base pairs ACGT, which are made up of ions of hydrongen , nitrogen , and oxygen. DNA is living thing and hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen are non-living. It is not found at what point these non-living ions become living things.
People say the brain is the centre for intelligence. But it is made up of only atoms and subatomic particles when studied deeply. Nullifying the differences between living and nonliving things.
Interesting isn’t it? Non living things oriented in particular manner in space and time become intelligent and they define unintelligent non-living things and give them the status of existence. But to get oriented in a particular way, you need to have organized effort which is nothing but intelligence. Intelligence and matter are inseparable So intelligence it self which is inseparable from matter when gets organized in one way it is called living and if organizes in other way it is called non-living..
This explains intelligence (living thing) is inseparable from matter (non-living things) and defines the existence of everything .
Scientific knowledge explains 2 things, the living and the non-living.
Living things have certain characters and are supposed to be different from the non-living.
Living things are characterized by their ability to recognize themselves. In perfect words they have the awareness of their own existence, where as the non-living (supposedly) don’t have this ability.
Now, try to understand this logic.
CASE 1:
Imagine yourself ship-wrecked and in a lonely island where there is nobody to recognize you. You are non-existent to the whole world (in fact the whole world is blissfully ignorant of your existence). But, you are aware of your existence. Here you have lost the character of existence in the view point of the world, however, your existence is there (thanks to your very own awareness). If you lose your awareness of your existence, you practically become non-existent.
CASE: 2
Imagine you are in a city and have lost your mind (some demylenating illness or in some kind of coma). In your very own opinion you don’t exist (in fact you don’t have an opinion). But, your existence will be there in the view-point of the world (because you are in a city and there are people who recognize your existence).
In the above mentioned cases there is one point in common that awareness is present in both and its existence is dependant on the ability to recognize (that awareness can be either your very own self’s or that of other intelligent beings’).
So, how can a non-living thing exist.(it is supposed to have no awareness of itself). The answer is quite evident. Their existence is dependent on the awareness or recognizing ability of intelligent beings.
How much is it dependent on intelligence?
Its dependence is complete (to the very fundamental and basic existence of intelligence). We shall see. Imagine if nobody sees a particular stone in a forest. Literally nobody sees it. Can we( or for that matter anyone) say the stone ever existed. We cant say because we did not perceive it (and the stone cant say that it exists because it lacks awareness) for all practical and theoretical purposes the stone does not exist.
This is a tricky situation, a doubt in your mind tells you “fine, why can’t the stone exist even if nobody observes it?” “do you mean to say that if I don’t observe the sun ( or for that matter if nobody observes the sun) will it cease to exist?”
The answer is very simple “yes”. If nobody ever witnessed the sun there will never be a question like the one you asked above. So, the question doesn’t properly satisfy the condition. If we are able to ask “whether this particular thing (here the stone in forest) existed or not.”, the very question ( because the question is nothing but intelligence/awareness) recognizes the existence of the stone (in question) thereby it does not satisfying the condition “if nobody ever observes………”. This means any doubts, questions, inquiries, analysis etc about the existence (of the stone) give the stone the status of existence.
Now we will try to understand it in a different example. Nobody ever witnessed a thing called “qowpgjffo”. (Before this second, I, myself don’t know anything about “qowpgjffo”). Since no one ever witnessed it or has at least a faint hint of its existence it does not exist.(but it comes in to existence the very second I gave this example “Nobody ever …….“qowpgjffo”, here my intelligence gives way to its existence).
So, non-living things exist nowhere but in the intelligence. Intelligence defines non-living things. In fact there is never any non-living thing , there is only intelligence in the form of living and non-living things. It is the intelligence that defines the living and non-living things as separate and distinct.
Scientifically speaking, imagine a glass of water in front of you. The water in the glass is not you, it is non-living “thing”. Now if you drink water, it becomes you ( a living thing). Water in a space enclosed by a tumbler is non living but when it is enclosed in a space surrounded by a living thing(here the stomach), it becomes living! Oh my gosh! Where is the separation between living and non living things.
Cell is 90% water and 9% salts, minerals, etc, rest contains proteins, fat globules, ions, energy, oxygen, CO2, etc. and we humans could not understand what is a living thing until now.
DNA contains base pairs ACGT, which are made up of ions of hydrongen , nitrogen , and oxygen. DNA is living thing and hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen are non-living. It is not found at what point these non-living ions become living things.
People say the brain is the centre for intelligence. But it is made up of only atoms and subatomic particles when studied deeply. Nullifying the differences between living and nonliving things.
Interesting isn’t it? Non living things oriented in particular manner in space and time become intelligent and they define unintelligent non-living things and give them the status of existence. But to get oriented in a particular way, you need to have organized effort which is nothing but intelligence. Intelligence and matter are inseparable So intelligence it self which is inseparable from matter when gets organized in one way it is called living and if organizes in other way it is called non-living..
This explains intelligence (living thing) is inseparable from matter (non-living things) and defines the existence of everything .
posted by Avadooth | 2:12 PM
1 Comments:
Interesting. :-) We are in the world of "effect".
"qowpgiffo" comes into existence because it has just been "invented".
The world of "cause" though must be different? It always was in existence! Before you invented it. You just gave it a name and maybe attached it so something already in existence whether it had already been named or not.
The world of cause must be beyond anything that can be rationalised, that would make it, irrational, impossible to define, yet in existence for all to recognise yet not possible to name.
Post a Comment
<< Home